I regret to inform you that the “is it a sin for moms to work?” issue has re-emerged from the ugly cave of groan-worthy online arguments. I’ve gone enough rounds on the ol’ internet to know that the militant people who make these claims are not going to be swayed by any reasoned argument and I’m not responding to change their minds.
I am writing this for people who are trying to live as faithful Catholics and may be influenced by recent conversations. The goal here is to build up Catholic families based on Church teaching and not on mis-placed nostalgia for the 1950s.
Here’s the crux of the matter: you get to prayerfully discern what’s best for your family. You. Not some stranger on the internet. Not someone turning their opinion into a universal mandate. You decide.
Who works and how much and where is up to you because you know what’s best for your kids and what will help your family to thrive. You know the circumstances, the challenges, the financial matters, the gifts and talents, the opportunities because it’s your family. That is why the Church wisely leaves it up to families to prayerfully discern things like this. There is no Vatican-issued secret checklist for these things–for a reason.
What Does the Church Say?
Does the Church say moms can’t work? Absolutely not. There are working mom saints like St. Zelie and St. Gianna. (And if you find yourself arguing that women can’t do what the female saints have already done, you should probably re-examine your position.)
The Catechism does not even address the issue of working mothers. If it was a mortal sin for a mother to work, obviously, this would be written out with clarity. Instead this is what the Catechism says, “Parents’ respect and affection are expressed by the care and attention they devote to bringing up their young children and providing for their physical and spiritual needs.”
You can dive into more on what the Church does say on the matter in Matt Fradd’s recent great post or in JoAnna Wahlund’s examination of the Catechism and papal encyclicals on the subject here. One thing of note is that Catholic social teaching claims that an economy should not be based on unjust wages that prevent families from living on one income. In other words, women shouldn’t be forced into wage labor:
“It is an intolerable abuse, and to be abolished at all cost, for mothers on account of the father’s low wage to be forced to engage in gainful occupations outside the home to the neglect of their proper cares and duties, especially the training of children. Every effort must therefore be made that fathers of families receive a wage large enough to meet ordinary family needs adequately. But if this cannot always be done under existing circumstances, social justice demands that changes be introduced as soon as possible whereby such a wage will be assured to every adult workingman.” Pope Pius XI’s Quadragesimo Anno
This encyclical from Pope Pius XI published in 1931 is aimed at communicating Catholic social teaching and addressing economic injustice including the flaws in the systems of unrestrained capitalism (among other systems). Social justice, Pope Pius XI claims, demands that fathers of families are given a living wage. Why does the Church support a living wage? Because, as the Catechism says, “Work is for man, not man for work.” Home life is important. Children are important. This I think we can all agree on. Kids need their parents. Infants need their mothers on a biological level, but all children need to be around their mother and their father–the more time, the better. The family is the school of love, it is the place where the very basic foundations of faith and human thriving are built.
And yet, instead of noting the context of this encyclical and its corrective purpose regarding employers and systems that treat workers unjustly, this quote has been twisted from noting the responsibility of employers and capitalists to a prescriptive judgement on mothers. It is telling that it is often cherrypicked from the encyclical while the critiques of unrestrained capitalism are often ignored. Unfortunately, the same unrestrained capitalism that failed to offer workers a living wage in 1931 still plagues families in contemporary America.
The Economic Reality
Let’s get back to the realities of the modern economy. Most families cannot survive on one income. Women can (and often must) support their families through profitable work. Feeding and housing your children is..well…a big piece of caring for kids and you should never feel guilty about providing for your children by using your gifts and talents in the world.
Here’s the kind of arguments you’ll hear from a tiny but vocal niche of Catholics who have taken up the mantle of Evangelical fundamentalists:
“It’s always possible to live on one income, so moms need never work.”
To this, I say, “Welcome to the post-recession economy!” While this may have been true for the baby boomers, it’s simply not always true today and anyone claiming it is sticking their head in the sand of their own privilege. If someone is telling you this lie, you can just drive on by knowing that this is someone who is not familiar with the changes in the economy and is out of touch with the struggles of today’s young families. The average worker of my generation makes 30% less than my parents’ generation did (after adjusting for inflation, etc.) Nostalgia for the past and dismissal of the economic struggles of those entering the workforce in a post-recession economy warps their view. Don’t waste your time.
Here’s another favorite line: “If you can’t live on one income, it’s because you’re living extravagantly.”
Are there couples out there who would do well to cut down on work hours and spend more time nurturing the home? Families who have more than enough to live on and are chasing a truly extravagant lifestyle to the detriment on their family life? Sure. But I’m pretty sure that’s not you. This is simply not the problem that young, faithful Catholics are facing.
Most of the emails I get from young families are from people trying to figure out how to save money, work fewer hours, and care for their children while still covering their mortgage and paying their family’s medical bills. They are struggling to figure out how to be open to life and survive in this economy. They don’t have expensive vehicles, high mortgages, and a designer wardrobe. They just want to be able to buy groceries and raise their kids! To tell these young families to just “make some sacrifices to live on one income” is absurd. They’re already sacrificing just to survive on two incomes!
People who judge families for having two working parents love to play the game of “I know your financial situation better than you.” The problem is…they don’t know your financial situation better than you.
I recently had complete strangers on Facebook telling me that I should quit writing and that it would be fine to just live on my husband’s income. (It wouldn’t.) If I can’t do that, they said, it’s my fault for not being frugal enough. Maybe they didn’t know they were talking to the family who sold their house and most of their belongings to live in a 650 sqft apartment without flushing toilets to increase family time together (it was a great move, no regrets, I wrote a book about it). Honey, I know how to sacrifice for family life!
For the 13 years of my married life we’ve had one vehicle, we know how to manage a grocery bill, we don’t have cable (and never have. Who has cable?), we make use of our public library, we moved to an affordable town and bought a small 3br/1bath in a low-income neighborhood for $75K. And yet the fine women of Facebook told me I just wasn’t trying hard enough to stay home.
Their advice: I should sell our home (they scoured my blog for pictures of our house and told me our 100yo starter home looked “very nice”) and I should move my family into a trailer in order to quit writing. Obviously it doesn’t make any kind of financial sense when renting in our area is significantly more expensive than owning and since our location makes it possible to have one vehicle since my husband runs to work to avoid an unnecessary car payment. But that’s just the point, we know every detail of our situation! They don’t. No matter how frugal you are, somebody out there thinks you should give up your home, your family’s healthcare, your mental health, you name it, in order to avoid working.
That is bizarre, Haley, why would they do this? I have a couple of theories.
–Acknowledging that many families cannot make do on one income comes from a place of privilege that they don’t want to acknowledge. Sure, if your husband is making six figures, your family’s survival won’t rely on your income as well. It can also be hard to acknowledge this if your political narrative rests on the lie that hardworking, employed families who can’t survive on one income cannot exist.
–They have a case of chronic New Mom Syndrome. New Mom Syndrome is what I call the disease some (not all!) new moms have in their desire to tell everyone else how they should be raising their kids. It comes from a place of fear and insecurity. “Your baby will sleep better if you do it THIS way,” says the woman with New Mom Syndrome. Her baby sleeps well that way. Surely yours would too!
After you’ve had a few kids you know that babies are different. Some are good sleepers, some are not. Their sleep has much more to do with how they’re wired than your bedtime routine. My first baby had to be rocked for HOURS before falling asleep at night. My fourth baby can be placed in her crib wide awake and she snuggles down with her blankie and goes straight to sleep. Different babies. It’s fine.
But for a woman with New Mom Syndrome, whether you put your baby to sleep the same way she does is personal. If your baby sleeps better with a different method than she uses, you are now a threat. When dealing with extreme insecurity, it’s essential for her to hold onto the idea that her way is not just a good way but the only way to put a baby to sleep.
The good news is that almost all moms grow out of this as they become more comfortable with motherhood and more informed. The bad news is that for some, New Mom Syndrome never goes away–and chronic NMS can be experienced by men, too. The way you structure your family life has to conform to the way they have structured their family life. If your family is thriving with a different work/life structure than the one they used, it’s a threat to the structure they fought for in their family life. The best thing to do when you realize someone never grew out of New Mom Syndrome is to back away slowly. Your family’s best interests are not the issue, the issue is this person’s insecurities and there’s really nothing you can do about that.
Another fan favorite: “If you can’t live on one income, your husband should just work more/get a better job.”
Most people do not seek out lower paying jobs when high paying jobs are available. If someone tells you your husband should just get a higher paying job, ask if they’re hiring. If not, they should keep their privileged opinion to themselves.
Dads Are Essential to Home and Family Life
The most telling claim from anti-working mom folks is their insistence that dads should just work more jobs. Mothers are important to family and home life, we all agree on that. But what about dads? Doesn’t having a present father matter to family life? Dads are more than a penis and a paycheck. A scenario in which dads are always working overtime and juggling multiple jobs while burnt out moms try to make up for his absence seems a strange one to pursue for the sake of 1950s nostalgia. This structure wasn’t even great in the 50s, it’s Mad Men at its worst. Dads matter.
And they don’t just matter to their kids. If you haven’t yet met a young mother so exhausted from financial stress and too many hours of solo parenting that it’s affecting her mental health, you either haven’t been around many young moms or they didn’t see you as someone they could open up to about their suffering. The isolation and loneliness women are suffering from is serious.
Having an engaged and present father is essential. Ignoring this fact should be a dead giveaway that the thriving of the family is NOT the goal of those who promote this model. If by sharing financial support, parents can both spend time with their children and work as a team together, that is a blessed thing.
This same dogged commitment to the 1950s structure fails to acknowledge that remote work opportunities and part-time opportunities are now widely available to both men and women. A two-income family doesn’t have to look like two parents working from 8am-5pm at an office! I’ve written out how being self-employed and working from home benefits our family in posts like this one and I’ve shared the basics of our daily schedule as a homeschooling family. Families are creatively making use of new, more flexible work/life structures to maximize family time. And those families get to decide if it’s working for them or not.
While we’re on the topic, one way to help young families thrive is to make work environments welcoming of children. I bring my baby with me when traveling to speaking events, for instance, and event organizers have been very accommodating. More of that welcoming attitude, please! There’s no point in ignoring the fact that most families need two incomes to pay their basic expenses, so instead of judging those families, encourage flexible employment that supports family togetherness so moms can feed and hang out with their kids!
You Decide What Makes Your Family Thrive
Just remember that while home and family life are the center of our vocations as married couples, you and no one else gets to decide the best way for you to nurture your home and children in your circumstances. If someone else is telling you there’s only one way to do it, drive on by.
The same people who say mothers need to spend every waking moment with their children are often the same people who don’t support a living wage that would make such a structure possible. You’ll also find that they often look down on people who take government assistance–something that many families require if both parents don’t work. There is no consistency here and what you end up with is a family structure that makes openness to life only possible for the wealthy and privileged. This is not Catholic teaching. This is not common sense. This is toxic and dangerous to young families.
If it makes more sense for mom to work and dad to stay home, do it. If it makes more sense for dad to work overtime so mom can stay home, do it. It it makes more sense for both parents to earn income, do it. The work you do as parents both in the home and earning wages is work done for the love of your family. Put your heart into all of it. Work as a team pursuing a family life in which your kids can thrive. That is what matters, not the opinions of strangers on the internet.
Andi says
I’m quite a but further down the parenting road and I can tell you – New Mom Syndrome persists WAY past the young childhood years. My husband and I have made huge financial sacrifices to send our teenager to a Catholic high school, and a (non-Catholic) friend decided to follow the same path with her child who is a year younger. Long story short…her child is back in public school. For the past year since they made that decision, she has taken every opportunity to make little “comments” about my child’s school – primarily, I think, because she is trying to make herself feel better about her decisions – and it’s exhausting. Self-awareness is hard, apparently. Not to mention that she knows enough about our financial situation to know that we’ve made major sacrifices, yet still she persists…
Jen says
Thank you. Just…thank you. My husband and I juggle a combined 6 jobs to keep us afloat. (Earning a living wage in ministry work from one job would be a nice upgrade, but I’m not holding my breath.) Bring on the support for dads and families in the workplace!
Elisa Forshey says
Oooh, thank you! I recently ended my homeschool mom career to enter the workforce for a myriad of reasons– both financial and educational– and the the level of judgement I feel coming from members of my former peer group is heartbreaking.
GiannaT says
As a young stay at home mom of two where only my husband works, and we have government assistance…
Yes to all of this.
Add to it that you shouldn’t be more Catholic than the pope about the jobs people take. At one point I considered taking a job as a Shipt shopper and had people saying I shouldn’t because I -might- have to deliver condoms with an order. (Catholic social teaching on this is that it’s not a direct enough cooperation with evil to be problematic, I looked it up).
Amy @ The Salt Stories says
So good Haley!!
“Dads are more than a penis and a paycheck.”
Also, what moms do in the workplace, online, and creatively is of value. It is a way to further the kingdom of God while providing for our children. The family is the primary vocation, but not the only way we live out our lives as disciples.
Anita says
This is one of those issues like fertility: It is between you, your husband and God.
When did it become ok for everyone to have an opinion on something so personal and private?
Debbie says
Let’s really blow their minds! How about if Mom just plain WANTS to work outside of the home? Perhaps for financial reasons, or heaven forbid, for personal satisfaction that love for children can’t completely provide? How about if we don’t WANT to live in a trailer but instead want to raise our kids in a cute urban condo or a suburban single with a swing in the yard? How about if we WANT our children (or child since, because we are selfish and on our way to hell anyway, we choose to have just one) to have the benefit of a Catholic education which, where I come from, is far from free? How about if we stop justifying our choices, to stay at home or not, to have one child or eight, to go to Mass once a week or eleven times a week? How about if we give each other a little grace? Thanks for writing such an important post.
Jen @ Bookish Family says
A great book that dispels many of the myths about the past people try to dredge up to justify these type of arguments is The Way We Never Were: https://amzn.to/31ZZ2Z5. I think you would like it. The 50s were an historical anomoly and surprise! lots of women worked then too!
Hillary says
Thank you, thank you, THANK YOU. I have to drop my five month old off at her first day of daycare tomorrow while I go back to teach for one more year. I’ve been miserable this whole weekend and feeling like a complete failure as a mother, despite the vague knowledge that every motherhood looks different, my husband and I have discerned this well, blah blah blah.
Understanding some of the motivations/reasons for these toxic ideas floating around the Catholic blogosphere is incredibly helpful and reassuring, tonight especially.
If you’ve got a second, I wouldn’t mind a quick prayer for fortitude tomorrow.
Alicia says
Praying for you, sister! Stay strong!
P says
Praying for you.
I had to leave my firstborn when she was 3 weeks old to go back to work. It is hard but all will be well. She is now 15, a devoted Catholic by choice, smart, kind, happy, and well adjusted.
Have peace in your heart!!
Kate says
Also praying. It is so hard…I’ve done that multiple times. My friend used to say to herself every morning as she left the house, “I go to work so that I can come home.”
Lisamarie says
I’d like to point out one more thing that I don’t see addressed often enough, even in groups of Catholic working mothers – some of us don’t actually HAVE to work. Some of us enjoy work, feel a special calling with our gifts in addition to our maternal vocation, etc. AND THAT’S OKAY. I highly recommend the writings of St. Edith Stein on the topic of the feminine vocation and professional life and how some women are in fact obligated to seek this out in order to fully develop their gifts. Naturally it should not detract from or familial obligations, but you can say the same thing about a man.
Her autobiography is also fascinating. The women in her life definitely ‘worked’ and ran the family businesses, etc, in addition to caring for the family. As somebody above has noted, the notion of the 50s housewife is not historically accurate.
Rachel says
I was thinking about Edith Stein as well 🙂 We are planning to name our next daughter Azelie Edith <3
Our current situation requires me to work but even in the future if things change I will most likely continue to work part time as I feel strongly that working as a Lactation Consultant is part of my Vocation!
This article was great!
P says
Thank you for this post!
I have been saying this for years.
My family has been on both ends of this spectrum dirt poor to six figures and you know what…..
At all times, balancing family, marriage, work, finances, home, etc etc etc is hard. Money doesn’t solve every problem. Life is hard y’all and frankly, I don’t have time to sit and contemplate someone else’s life or care about what someone else thinks.
All the women I know, that stay at home or work, are all doing their best. All I can do is support them, encourage them and offer a helping hand. I often make a meal for my girlfriends that work or take the kids from my friend that stays home so she can get a break.
Again, we are all doing our best.
Kate S. says
This is excellent. So well-stated and supported and sound. Thank you for this post!
Stacy says
You have good points, but when you use terms like “militant” vs “faithful Catholics” you are fueling the fire to soothe your offended feelings. How can you make your point without it being us vs them? That seems to be the issue for our country, the blame game of us vs them. Until we seek to embrace our differences and respect each other (even if “them” don’t deserve it) we further the divide. Support each other. Be kind. Let go of pride. Explain your opinions and situation without being defensive. Is your voice helping God?
Sabine says
How would you describe those who say it is a mortal sin for mothers to work if militant is too harsh r not accurate?
Erika says
No one sounds more like their feelings are offended than you
Jeni says
Brava Haley — mostly impressed you packed so much into one post and it’s still super fun to read. Definitely a talented writer. Laughed out loud at the “honey” bit.
Also loving the red hair.
Jeni says
P.s how on earth do you deal with people on the internet like that? Seriously though! I have a hard enough time with judgmental people with my little Montessori corner of IG — and that doesn’t even compare.
Audrey says
Taylor Marshall and Timothy Gordon are living their lives kind of like Don Quixote–except they are not bringing good into the world. I truly believe they are a stain on the Catholic Church.
Marie says
I completely disagree with this statement. When I think of stains on the Church these two guys do not come to my mind.
Katie says
I’ve been the breadwinner of my married (newlywed) relationship so far, supporting my husband through his last year of school. It’s taken a lot of stress off my husband, and I enjoy working outside the home. Even though my husband starts a well-paying job soon, I will still continue to work. When we have children, my plan is to continue to work. I write, and would love to publish as well. I’d also love to get involved in local government. I think there’s great value in having more women’s and mother’s voices in public spaces such as the workplace. God doesn’t limit our calling, and it’s up to each individual to discern what we’re called to do. The way I see it, anyone who wants to dictate that women shouldn’t work not only is clinging to misogynist ideology, but also is placing limits on God.
Eleanor says
This is the best thing you’ve written, in my humble opinion! My husband left a job as an engineer to become a teacher at a CATHOLIC school. He is excellent at it, he found his calling. But his salary is so dismal, considerably worse than public school teachers. Therefore, I became the major breadwinner. I get so angry when I hear these opinions about working from Catholic families, and then Catholic institutions do nothing, nothing to provide a living wage where a family could survive on one income. They also can have some of the worst maternity leave policies. If we, as Catholics, really truly cared about these issues and believed that all babies and mothers/fathers, not just wealthy families, should have time to bond, Catholic institutions would be the leaders in providing just wages and adequate family time. I grew up with both of my parents working for the church and having four kids, and now they are nearing retirement with no savings and still giving their absolute all for low salaries.
Margaret says
In defense of Catholic schools, I think most of them would like to offer higher salaries, they just don’t have the money. The easiest way to pay people like your husband more would be to raise tuition, but this would cause hardships for student families who are already struggling to afford Catholic education. It’s a difficult problem.
Laura says
Wow, it’s amazing how judgmental people can be from all sides. I can’t really relate to what you have experienced. I have a PhD and feel so much societal pressure to be working. Many women in my circles are highly educated, pursuing careers outside the home that take them away from their children most of the day. I’m far more likely to encounter the opinion that it really doesn’t matter who raises the children from 8:00am-6:00pm every day and that women should meet all their career goals without interference from children. Maybe there is some defensiveness on my part, but I chose not to work because I believe that it is an objective truth (and proven through research) that children are better off in the care of a parent than in daycare all day (unless said parent is incompetent or mentally ill). I can’t imagine coming after a homeschooling mom who writes to support her family, or anyone for that matter… But I do think it is important to acknowledge that secular society vastly underplays to importance of a parent’s presence in the lives of children. Women are being raised with the message that their home and family life should take a backseat to career aspirations and that choosing not to work is a total waste of time and potential. OR that it really doesn’t matter as long as your intentions are good and you still have some great “quality time” with the kids on weekends. Perhaps this attitude is what has caused the pendulum to swing so dramatically to the other side in these online circles. I know I feel the irritation and the need to defend my choice to be a “SAHM” quite often.
Arielle says
I’m in a similar boat to you, Laura – living in the neighborhood around Yale & surrounded by high powered working women and empty parks during the day. Pointing out that perhaps children benefit from being in the care of someone who loves them above all else is verboten in my circles. And on the other hand you have a homeschooling mom of 4 who has written for years about her dedication to family, who’s getting flack for taking the time to write a blog! It’s incredible. The more I go on in life, the more I see that every family has do to what works for them. Sounds like a truism when you first hear it, but when you witness the blood, sweat, and tears that ALL moms go through to do the best for their kids, your judgment starts to loosen up a bit.
Hedgehog says
Growing up in a family with a disabled dad I heard so much of this garbage. It’s disheartening to hear Christians say that a person’s worth comes down to how much money they make.
Lois says
I love the New Mom Syndrome term. I definitely regret my intense opinions and judgmental attitudes in earlier motherhood, and have seen how God used my failures as a mother to humble me overall.
I’ve often noticed recently that it’s newer moms who seem most firm and judgmental in their convictions (baby sleep, feeding, screen rules, etc), but moms with more experience tend to be sympathetic and compassionate. Though, as you say, some people unfortunately haven’t left that stage no matter how many kids or how old their kids are….still seem to want to convince you they’ve done everything right!
Sarah says
Thank you, Haley, for writing on this important topic. We each have our own unique calling.
Julie says
Thank you for writing this! It is one of the reasons I got off twitter because I just couldn’t handle the judgmental, condemning opinions of those who essentially say the only right Catholic way is to have 15 kids, with the mom staying home and the dad working overtime and multiple jobs and essentially never being home to pay the bills, without the use of government assistance, or without the use of NFP for justified reasons like finances or mental health, etc, etc. Most Catholic moms/dads/families are just doing the best they can! I am open to wherever God leads…ideally I will be able to stay home and homeschool but to say that’s the only right way is ridiculous. Financially, it’s just not always conducive. Mental-health wise, it isn’t always conducive. For reasons we are not always aware of because it stays between God and the families as it should, it’s not always conducive. Also find it so interesting how the 1950s “glamorized” home life isn’t exactly accurate.