Tag Archives: women

Catholicism: Empowering Women for 2000 Years (Part III: Female Saints and Doctors of the Church)

So we’ve talked about how Marian doctrine taught me to celebrate my womanhood and how the Catholic idea of vocation honors women. But I want to share with you how learning about the saints and doctors of the Church taught me to love the diversity and strength of women in the communion of saints.

In Part II I shared how before converting to Catholicism, I felt that my gifts didn’t fit in anywhere in the church. It wasn’t until I started learning about the saints that I discovered that there is a place for everyone. Just because the Church teaches that men and women have different roles, that doesn’t mean that Catholic women are rigidly boxed into a narrow “type.” There are holy women that are completely different from each other and each Christian is called to display Christ’s love in a unique and beautiful way. If each of us were a stained glass window, we would have our own unique image to display the light of Christ.

So what kind of women are honored as saints of the Church?

There are warriors. St. Joan of Arc certainly didn’t fit into a traditional female role. Born a peasant, she was not a homemaker, mother, wife, or nun. She was a fearless military leader. Yet, she is held up as a model of Christian devotion. An interesting choice for a Church criticized for wanting all it’s women barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen.

There are mothers. A striking juxtaposition to St. Joan is St. Elizabeth Anne Seton, a fellow convert, loving wife and mother, and a lover of literature that was devoted to education and service. The first native-born American to be declared a saint! There’s also St. Monica, the holy mother of St. Augustine whose faithful prayers ushered him into the faith. Or St. Gwen, my confirmation saint, who gave birth to three saints, was kidnapped by Anglo-Saxon pagans, escaped twice, and was later martyred.

There are holy virgins. Take St. Lucy, for example, who fiercely defied being bullied into an unwanted marriage with a pagan Roman, undergoing the cruelest tortures her persecutors could imagine. She remained devoted to her Christian faith despite her torturers attempts to blind her, burn her, and send her to a brothel and was martyred for her faith.

No story is the same. No woman is the same. By holding up these amazing women for all Christians to emulate, the Church affirms that women are courageous, strong, persevering, faithful, intelligent, influential, and valuable.

Perhaps even more astonishing than the diversity of female saints, especially considering the inequality in education that women have encountered throughout history, there are four women who are named Doctors of the Church, a rare title that elevates their writings as greatly influential works that are helpful to the Church. To put this in perspective, there are only two popes who are named Doctors of the Church. I always thought that only folks like St. Thomas Aquinas, highly educated dead white guys, held that sort of honor. Not so. I think this speaks volumes to the respect the Church has for a woman’s mind. There’s certainly a higher percentage of women included here than I encountered in the texts studied in any of my Philosophy classes.

One of these amazing Doctors of the Church, St. Catherine of Siena, refused to accept the role her family had in mind for her: to marry well in medieval Italy. Instead, this holy woman devoted herself to a life of consecrated virginity. She was illiterate (until later in life when she was given the ability to read and write by supernatural means) but became the advisor of popes and political leaders. During a time of great turmoil for the Church, this strong and brave woman held great sway and blessed the Church with her holy guidance.

St. Therese of Lisieux, on the other hand, wasn’t a public figure by any stretch of the imagination and her desire was to serve God through “the little way” or the ordinary, every day tasks of one’s life. She lived a cloistered life and died very young of tuberculosis. Yet, the writings she left behind are honored next to those of popes and bishops. She is, in fact, the youngest of all the Doctors of the Church.

St. Hildegard of Bingen was a medieval abbess and a polymath, musician, poet, illuminator, philosopher, theologian, and visionary. During the era misnamed the “dark age,” St. Hildegard’s stunning intellect and writings shone with her vibrant faith. Even as a little girl, decades before my conversion, I was intrigued by St. Hildegard’s fascinating life and intelligence.

St. Teresa of Avila was a Carmelite nun, mystic,  and influential writer of the Counter Reformation era. Her great works, such as The Interior Castle, are prized for their insights on the contemplative life and mental prayer.

Warriors, mothers, martyrs, aristocrats, peasants, academics or illiterate, there is room for everyone. Getting to know the saints has given me a new perspective of a “woman’s role” in the Church. It is not narrow. It is not rigid. There is a place for everyone to be celebrated for the gifts God has given them and the unique way they can serve his Holy Church.

The end of this series, Part IV, on Church teachings about marriage, fertility, and contraception coming soon.

(image source: lenarpoetry.blogspot.com, from Sacred Heart Catholic Church, Dover, NJ)

EmailFacebookGoogle ReaderPinterestTumblrTwitterShare

Catholicism: Empowering Women for 2000 Years (Part II: But Women Can’t Be Priests!)

Last week I shared how understanding the Marian doctrine of the Catholic Church empowered me to celebrate my femininity. If you missed Part I: The Blessed Virgin Mary, go back to start there.

But Haley!” you might be thinking. “Empowered? Really? Women can’t be equal to men in the Church because they can’t be priests!” We’ve all heard about this issue in the media lately ad nauseum. Certainly, Marian doctrine can give us another perspective.  Pope John Paul II wrote in Ordinatio Sacerdotalis,

“[T]he fact that the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God and Mother of the Church, received neither the mission proper to the Apostles nor the ministerial priesthood clearly shows that the non-admission of women to priestly ordination cannot mean that women are of lesser dignity, nor can it be construed as discrimination against them. Rather, it is to be seen as the faithful observance of a plan to be ascribed to the wisdom of the Lord of the universe.”

If Our Lady, first among Christians and saints, the Queen of Heaven, wasn’t included in the priesthood, it doesn’t bother me at all that I can’t become a priest, either.

But furthermore, perceiving the non-admission of women to the priesthood as a degradation misses the richness of Catholic teaching on the idea of vocation. There are four vocations: Priesthood, Religious Life (monks and nuns), Marriage, and Single Life. Lumen Gentium states that all Christians are called “to the fullness of the Christian life and to the perfection of charity.” All vocations are paths to this end and all are equal and necessary to the Church. A priest is not holier than a married or single woman because of his status as a priest. A celibate priest doesn’t get “extra credit” while God shakes his head disapprovingly at the carnal existence of a married couple. Marriage is not base. It is just as holy and sacred as a priestly vocation. The same is true of the vocation of a woman who chooses single life or religious life.

But there is the undeniable truth that the Church sees men and women as different from each other and therefore fulfilling different roles. The reasoning behind having a male priesthood is partially because Christ our Lord and High Priest was a man and a priest stands in persona Christi, he represents Christ in a special way. Furthermore, there’s the inescapable fact that when Our Lord Jesus chose his apostles, he chose twelve men. This is the model he gives to his Church for ordination.

It’s notable that although Our Lord had many faithful female followers, like Our Lady, they were not included as one of the twelve disciples. Among these devoted women are St. Mary Magdalene, the first person to see Our Lord after the Resurrection and the women at the tomb who are first told of the Resurrection on Easter morning. These women show a deep love for Christ and faith in Him that seems to surpass that of the twelve disciples who respond to the news that Jesus is risen with shock and skepticism. So certainly, the exclusion of women from the priesthood has nothing to do with a woman’s capacity for holiness. It’s not that the Church doesn’t respect women and wants to be a grumpy ol’ stick in the mud instead of progressively getting with the times. The Church doesn’t have the authority to ordain women. Christ revealed his plan for the priesthood by example and the Church trusts in his plan.

I don’t feel oppressed because the Church says I am different from a man and fulfill a different role. I am different. I can no more be a priest than my priest could be a mother. Saying women are no different from men is truly insulting. I love my womanhood as it is honored and celebrated by the Church. I love that the Salvation of the world was born of a woman. I love that my unique biology makes it possible for me to participate in the creation of life in a way that no man has ever experienced. I am different and I want that to be celebrated, not ignored.

By affirming that women cannot take on the role of priest, the Church does not mean that women are second-class, less intelligent, less holy, less capable, etc. As I will discuss in more detail in Part III of this series (The Saints), women are not relegated to home and hearth. There are so many different paths women may choose for their lives that are lauded by the Church! Are there Christian sects in which a woman’s role is rigidly narrow, even to the point of keeping some women from using their God-given talents for his glory? Unfortunately, yes. But this is not the case in the Catholic Church.

I grew up in a Protestant church in which there were no women clergy; however, in addition to women being excluded from being in pulpit, a woman was not even allowed to teach a bible study that included men. Regardless of her skill as a teacher or theologian, “Women don’t have a teaching role in the church like men do,” I was told. Does it matter that the woman who wants to teach a study on one of the Gospels is the only scholar of biblical languages in the congregation? Nope, no woman can teach a man on matters of faith. So where does that leave women who aren’t great at making lemon bars for the church bake sale, but are skilled differently? The truth is that some of us feel painfully out of place. (Nothing against lemon bars. Although, I prefer a good chocolate chip cookie if anybody’s asking.)

I don’t share this experience to be overly critical of loving and faithful Christian brothers and sisters, and I want to make it clear that this exclusion of women from any teaching role is NOT the case in every Protestant congregation by any means. Other Protestant churches I attended differed widely on this matter and some even had female clergy. But I give this example to distinguish between affirming that women cannot be priests and boxing women into such a narrow role that some are left wondering, “Where is the place for me?” I am grateful to have found a place in the Catholic Church that celebrates and honors the various and valuable gifts of women and their contributions to the Church.

(Part III, coming soon)

Edit: please see the helpful comments below that clarify the vocations. Single life cannot be chosen as a secular vocation (outside of religious vocations) without choosing a life of consecrated virginity.

image source: worldvisitguide.com

EmailFacebookGoogle ReaderPinterestTumblrTwitterShare